My prediction for the Gentlemen’s Singles was wrong – I was sure Andy Murray (with his big biceps) was ready to take Wimbledon and Federer with Nadal out of the way. With Federer appearing to suffer some doubts and lack of confidence recently (obviously alleviated somewhat by his French Open win), I thought Murray’s increasing confidence would carry him through the pressure of the British press – apparently not.
The ability to keep pressure off in both squash and tennis is key. I just finished two weeks of squash camp with Mike Johnson (former coach of Fitzgerald, Eyles and Ricketts amongst others) and he reckons this ability is the most important for players to acquire. According to Johnson, the inability to keep pressure off (“I must win this match”) is the number one reason players underperform.
It was very clear in the Wimbledon women’s final that the William’s sisters are the dominant force in women’s tennis today (check the video!). Their father played the key role in keeping the pressure off them in their formative years – forbidding them to play in junior tennis tournaments from the age of 12-14. My hypothesis is that this allowed them to develop that “go for it” attitude which obviously has become a habit. The lack of tournament pressure also allowed them to develop a variety of skills unhindered by the need to “win that match today”. My two weeks with 70 of the U.S.’ top junior squash players has reconfirmed my belief that the “need to win” is the number one barrier to making necessary changes in one’s squash technique and tactics. Many junior squash players are unwilling to accept the temporary drop in performance that would come with a grip change for example. Since accepting a temporary performance decrement in exchange for future gains is logical, there must be external forces (parents, coach, tournament environment) acting on the junior.
Squash is much more tactical than singles tennis, especially tennis played on grass (with an average of less than three shots per rally). Doubles tennis on the other hand, is at least as tactical and perhaps more so: the addition of the net game, poaching and faking, variety in positioning (both up, both back, Australian), use of the lob (rarely seen in singles), etc. It was great to see the Canadian Nestor come through for the second year in a row. I never worked with Nestor but did work with Canadian Sebastien Lareau (Olympic Doubles Medalist), and last week at Princeton ran into Canadian and former world number 1 doubles Glenn Michibata (with Grant Connell) – now coaching the men’s tennis team at Princeton. Why has Canada produced so many top-ranked doubles players over the last 10-15 years? It has to do with Tennis Canada’s Tactics First Approach to training their tennis coaches. Their tactics first approach has been the official coaching method in Canada since at least 1985. Although the Canadian tennis players are too few and not talented enough to regularly break into the top 100 in singles – in a sport which prioritizes tactics, they have dominated (per capita) the top ranking spots over the last 15 years. Smart play can overcome a lack of physical talent – a great lesson for sqush coaches. in order to develop this “squash intelligence” coaches need to use a Tactics First Approach.
Application for Squash Coaches:
- Help keep the pressure off your junior squash players through proper goal setting (task not win goals) and an emphasis on longterm development.
- Use a Tactics First Approach to develop squash intelligence in your players